<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2.0.0.5 Password Vulnerability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gopaultech.com/blog/2007/07/firefox-2005-password-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gopaultech.com/blog/2007/07/firefox-2005-password-vulnerability/</link>
	<description>::Technology is Power::</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:06:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Menezes</title>
		<link>http://gopaultech.com/blog/2007/07/firefox-2005-password-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Menezes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gopaultech.com/blog/2007/07/23/firefox-2005-password-vulnerability/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s not much of an exploit. Look at the source. Firefox populates the same exact fields IF it&#039;s on the same domain. This &quot;exploit&quot; just allows it to populate those fields (they have the same names, and they&#039;re on the same domain as the ones you submitted earlier), then reads the result. It would work with any browser that has this feature. It&#039;s not an exploit at all. Just a website trying to scare people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s not much of an exploit. Look at the source. Firefox populates the same exact fields IF it&#8217;s on the same domain. This &#8220;exploit&#8221; just allows it to populate those fields (they have the same names, and they&#8217;re on the same domain as the ones you submitted earlier), then reads the result. It would work with any browser that has this feature. It&#8217;s not an exploit at all. Just a website trying to scare people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Covarr</title>
		<link>http://gopaultech.com/blog/2007/07/firefox-2005-password-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Covarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gopaultech.com/blog/2007/07/23/firefox-2005-password-vulnerability/#comment-660</guid>
		<description>An easier and less inconvenient solution would be to simply remember your passwords. It&#039;s not that hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An easier and less inconvenient solution would be to simply remember your passwords. It&#8217;s not that hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

